- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources3
- Resource Type
-
0000000003000000
- More
- Availability
-
21
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Ouyang, Zhiyun (2)
-
Ruckelshaus, Mary (2)
-
Arroyo, Mary T.K. (1)
-
Bartuska, Ann M. (1)
-
Bateman, Ian J. (1)
-
Battista, Willow (1)
-
Boyd, James (1)
-
Bustamante, Rodrigo H (1)
-
Báldi, András (1)
-
Cao, Ling (1)
-
Daily, Gretchen C. (1)
-
Daniels, Benjamin N (1)
-
Finkbeiner, Elena M (1)
-
Fujita, Rod (1)
-
Fulton, Elizabeth A (1)
-
Gaines, Steven (1)
-
Gelcich, Stefan (1)
-
Jackson, Stephen T. (1)
-
Jacobs, Katharine L. (1)
-
Joppa, Lucas N. (1)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Brennan K. (0)
-
& Brennan, K. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Ferretti, F. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& J. Peters (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Sahin. I. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
(submitted - in Review for IEEE ICASSP-2024) (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Blue food systems are crucial for meeting global social and environmental goals. Both small-scale marine fisheries (SSFs) and aquaculture contribute to these goals, with SSFs supporting hundreds of millions of people and aquaculture currently expanding in the marine environment. Here we examine the interactions between SSFs and aquaculture, and the possible combined benefits and trade-offs of these interactions, along three pathways: (1) resource access and rights allocation; (2) markets and supply chains; and (3) exposure to and management of risks. Analysis of 46 diverse case studies showcase positive and negative interaction outcomes, often through competition for space or in the marketplace, which are context-dependent and determined by multiple factors, as further corroborated by qualitative modeling. Results of our mixed methods approach underscore the need to anticipate and manage interactions between SSFs and aquaculture deliberately to avoid negative socio-economic and environmental outcomes, promote synergies to enhance food production and other benefits, and ensure equitable benefit distribution.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available December 1, 2025
-
Ouyang, Zhiyun; Song, Changsu; Zheng, Hua; Polasky, Stephen; Xiao, Yi; Bateman, Ian J.; Liu, Jianguo; Ruckelshaus, Mary; Shi, Faqi; Xiao, Yang; et al (, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)Gross domestic product (GDP) summarizes a vast amount of economic information in a single monetary metric that is widely used by decision makers around the world. However, GDP fails to capture fully the contributions of nature to economic activity and human well-being. To address this critical omission, we develop a measure of gross ecosystem product (GEP) that summarizes the value of ecosystem services in a single monetary metric. We illustrate the measurement of GEP through an application to the Chinese province of Qinghai, showing that the approach is tractable using available data. Known as the “water tower of Asia,” Qinghai is the source of the Mekong, Yangtze, and Yellow Rivers, and indeed, we find that water-related ecosystem services make up nearly two-thirds of the value of GEP for Qinghai. Importantly most of these benefits accrue downstream. In Qinghai, GEP was greater than GDP in 2000 and three-fourths as large as GDP in 2015 as its market economy grew. Large-scale investment in restoration resulted in improvements in the flows of ecosystem services measured in GEP (127.5%) over this period. Going forward, China is using GEP in decision making in multiple ways, as part of a transformation to inclusive, green growth. This includes investing in conservation of ecosystem assets to secure provision of ecosystem services through transregional compensation payments.more » « less
-
Ruckelshaus, Mary H.; Jackson, Stephen T.; Mooney, Harold A.; Jacobs, Katharine L.; Kassam, Karim-Aly S.; Arroyo, Mary T.K.; Báldi, András; Bartuska, Ann M.; Boyd, James; Joppa, Lucas N.; et al (, Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
An official website of the United States government
